IVAL Comprehensive E2E Testing

Rival Login Page
E2E Test Report

Comprehensive Playwright Automation Testing & Findings

40
Total Tests
35
Passed
5
Failed
87.5%
Pass Rate

📍 http://cortexone-internal.rival.io:3131/login
🗓️ December 14, 2025
🔬 Playwright v1.57.0 • Chromium Browser

Test Methodology

Comprehensive E2E Testing Framework

Automated testing using Playwright automation agent with multi-layer evaluation capabilities

🔍

UI Evaluation

Form elements, navigation, component detection, screenshot capture across viewports

🔐

Security Analysis

Header validation, cookie inspection, HTTPS verification, data exposure checks

WCAG Compliance

Keyboard navigation, ARIA attributes, color contrast, alt text verification

📱

Responsive Design

Mobile (375px, 667px), Tablet (768px), Desktop (1920px), Landscape testing

Performance

Page load metrics, resource analysis, console error detection, FCP/LCP measurement

🔗

Technology Stack

Framework detection, bundle analysis, OAuth integration, third-party services

✅ Test Coverage: 40 comprehensive tests across 9 categories with automated reporting and screenshot evidence
Executive Summary

Key Findings & Overall Assessment

✅ Strengths

  • Functional authentication interface
  • Good performance (FCP <3s)
  • Keyboard navigation working
  • OAuth integration (Google, GitHub)
  • Responsive on most viewports
  • Clean, minimalist design

❌ Critical Issues

  • CRITICAL Missing security headers
  • CRITICAL HTTP instead of HTTPS
  • HIGH Mobile horizontal scrolling
  • MEDIUM Missing image alt text
  • MEDIUM Limited client validation
  • MEDIUM Minimal ARIA attributes
⚠️ Overall Grade: C+
Functional interface with critical security hardening needed before production use. Immediate action required on HTTPS and security headers.

Technology Stack Detected

Authentication: Descope (Web Components)
OAuth: Google, GitHub
Analytics: Google Analytics
Framework: Custom Web Components (DESCOPE-WC)

Issue #1: Missing Security Headers

🔴 CRITICAL: Missing Security Headers

Application is vulnerable to multiple attack vectors due to absence of essential security headers

CRITICAL
No Security Headers Implemented

Vulnerability to: Clickjacking, XSS, MIME sniffing, Frame-based attacks

Missing Headers:

Header Purpose Impact if Missing
X-Frame-Options Prevent clickjacking Page can be embedded in malicious frames
X-Content-Type-Options Prevent MIME sniffing Browser may execute files as wrong type
Strict-Transport-Security Force HTTPS Vulnerable to MITM attacks on first visit
Content-Security-Policy Prevent XSS Inline scripts can be injected

Solution Code (Express.js):

// middleware/security-headers.ts
import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from 'express';

export function securityHeaders(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) {
  // Prevent clickjacking
  res.setHeader('X-Frame-Options', 'DENY');

  // Prevent MIME sniffing
  res.setHeader('X-Content-Type-Options', 'nosniff');

  // Enforce HTTPS
  res.setHeader(
    'Strict-Transport-Security',
    'max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload'
  );

  // Content Security Policy
  res.setHeader(
    'Content-Security-Policy',
    "default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: https:; font-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self' https:; frame-ancestors 'none';"
  );

  // XSS Protection (legacy)
  res.setHeader('X-XSS-Protection', '1; mode=block');

  // Referrer Policy
  res.setHeader('Referrer-Policy', 'strict-origin-when-cross-origin');

  // Permissions Policy
  res.setHeader(
    'Permissions-Policy',
    'geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=(), payment=()'
  );

  next();
}

// app.ts - Add middleware to express app
app.use(securityHeaders);
RIV-XXX CRITICAL

Implement Security Headers

Acceptance Criteria (BDD):
  • Given a request to the login page
    When the response is received
    Then X-Frame-Options header should be set to 'DENY'
  • Given a request to the login page
    When the response is received
    Then X-Content-Type-Options header should be set to 'nosniff'
  • Given a request to the login page
    When the response is received
    Then Strict-Transport-Security header should include max-age=31536000
  • Given a request to the login page
    When the response is received
    Then Content-Security-Policy header should be present with appropriate directives
Issue #2: HTTP Instead of HTTPS

🔴 CRITICAL: Login Page Using HTTP

Authentication credentials transmitted over unencrypted connection - major security vulnerability

CRITICAL
Unencrypted Credential Transmission

Current: http://cortexone-internal.rival.io:3131/login

Security Implications:

  • Login credentials visible to network intermediaries
  • Man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks possible
  • Session tokens exposed in transit
  • OAuth tokens vulnerable to interception
  • Violates OWASP and compliance requirements

Solution: Enable HTTPS/TLS

// nginx.conf - SSL Configuration
server {
    listen 443 ssl http2;
    server_name cortexone-internal.rival.io;

    # SSL Certificate Configuration
    ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/ssl/rival.crt;
    ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/ssl/rival.key;

    # SSL Protocol and Ciphers
    ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3;
    ssl_ciphers HIGH:!aNULL:!MD5;
    ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on;

    # HSTS Header
    add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload" always;

    # Security headers
    add_header X-Frame-Options "DENY" always;
    add_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" always;
    add_header X-XSS-Protection "1; mode=block" always;

    location / {
        proxy_pass http://localhost:3131;
        proxy_set_header Host $host;
        proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
        proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
        proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
    }
}

# HTTP Redirect to HTTPS
server {
    listen 80;
    server_name cortexone-internal.rival.io;
    return 301 https://$server_name$request_uri;
}
RIV-XXX CRITICAL

Enable HTTPS/TLS for Login Page

Acceptance Criteria (BDD):
  • Given a user accesses the login page
    When they navigate to http://cortexone-internal.rival.io
    Then they should be redirected to https://cortexone-internal.rival.io
  • Given a request to the login page
    When HTTPS connection is established
    Then the SSL/TLS certificate should be valid and chain to trusted CA
  • Given a secure HTTPS connection
    When credentials are transmitted
    Then they should be encrypted end-to-end
  • Given any HTTP request
    When received by the server
    Then HSTS header should inform browsers to always use HTTPS
Issue #3: Mobile Horizontal Scrolling

🟠 HIGH: Mobile Horizontal Scrolling

WCAG 2.1 AA violation - page content exceeds mobile viewport width

HIGH
Responsive Design Violation (1.4.10 Reflow)

Affects mobile viewport: 375x667px

Issue Details:

  • Desktop (1920x1080): ✅ Renders perfectly
  • Tablet (768x1024): ✅ Renders perfectly
  • Mobile (375x667): ❌ Horizontal scrolling required
  • Mobile Landscape (667x375): ✅ Renders with adjustment

CSS Fix:

/* Identify and fix mobile overflow */

/* Option 1: Add responsive container */
.login-container {
    max-width: 100%;
    width: 100vw;
    overflow-x: hidden;
    padding: 20px;
}

.form-wrapper {
    width: 100%;
    max-width: 400px;
    margin: 0 auto;
}

/* Option 2: Fix specific element causing overflow */
img {
    max-width: 100%;
    height: auto;
    display: block;
}

/* Option 3: Add mobile breakpoint */
@media (max-width: 375px) {
    .login-container {
        padding: 15px;
        margin: 0;
    }

    form {
        width: 100%;
    }

    input,
    button {
        width: 100%;
        font-size: 16px; /* Prevents zoom on iOS */
    }

    .oauth-buttons {
        display: flex;
        flex-direction: column;
        gap: 10px;
    }

    .oauth-buttons button {
        width: 100%;
    }
}

/* Option 4: Ensure viewport meta tag is correct */

HTML: <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=5.0">

RIV-XXX HIGH

Fix Mobile Responsive Design (WCAG 1.4.10)

Acceptance Criteria (BDD):
  • Given a mobile viewport of 375x667px
    When the login page is rendered
    Then no horizontal scrolling should be required
  • Given various mobile viewports (320px to 480px)
    When the page is displayed
    Then all content should fit within viewport width
  • Given form inputs on mobile
    When focused
    Then they should not trigger zoom (font-size ≥ 16px)
  • Given WCAG 2.1 AA compliance testing
    When criterion 1.4.10 is checked
    Then no reflow violations should exist
Issue #4: Missing Image Alt Text

🟡 MEDIUM: Missing Image Alt Text

WCAG 2.1 A - Screen reader users cannot identify logo (Criterion 1.1.1)

MEDIUM
Logo Image Missing Alt Text

WCAG Criterion 1.1.1 Non-text Content (Level A)

Current HTML:

<img src="rival-logo.png" />

Fixed HTML:

<img src="rival-logo.png" alt="Rival" height="30" width="auto" />

Why This Matters:

  • Screen reader users need to understand the logo represents Rival
  • Improves SEO and accessibility scoring
  • Required for WCAG Level A compliance
  • Minimal effort fix with significant impact

Additional Recommendations:

  • Test alt text with screen reader (NVDA, JAWS)
  • Consider decorative vs. informative images
  • Use role="presentation" for purely decorative images
RIV-XXX MEDIUM

Add Alt Text to Logo Image

Acceptance Criteria (BDD):
  • Given the Rival logo image
    When the page renders
    Then the img element should have alt="Rival"
  • Given a screen reader
    When reading the page
    Then it should announce "Rival Logo" or "Rival"
  • Given automated accessibility testing
    When checking criterion 1.1.1
    Then no violations should be reported
Issue #5: Limited Client-Side Validation

🟡 MEDIUM: Client-Side Form Validation

Improve user feedback with real-time validation and aria-invalid states

MEDIUM
Missing Real-Time Validation Feedback

Affects user experience and accessibility

Current Issue:

  • No client-side validation feedback
  • No aria-invalid attributes on error states
  • Users don't know if input is valid until submission
  • No visible error messages

Implementation Code:

// validation.ts - Real-time form validation
export class LoginFormValidator {
    private emailInput: HTMLInputElement;
    private passwordInput: HTMLInputElement;

    constructor() {
        this.emailInput = document.querySelector('input[type="email"]')!;
        this.passwordInput = document.querySelector('input[type="password"]')!;
    }

    validateEmail(email: string): boolean {
        const emailRegex = /^[^\\s@]+@[^\\s@]+\\.[^\\s@]+$/;
        return emailRegex.test(email);
    }

    validatePassword(password: string): boolean {
        // At least 8 characters, 1 uppercase, 1 lowercase, 1 number
        return password.length >= 8 &&
               /[A-Z]/.test(password) &&
               /[a-z]/.test(password) &&
               /[0-9]/.test(password);
    }

    init() {
        this.emailInput.addEventListener('blur', () => this.validateEmailField());
        this.emailInput.addEventListener('input', () => this.validateEmailField());

        this.passwordInput.addEventListener('blur', () => this.validatePasswordField());
        this.passwordInput.addEventListener('input', () => this.validatePasswordField());
    }

    private validateEmailField() {
        const email = this.emailInput.value;
        const isValid = !email || this.validateEmail(email);

        if (!isValid) {
            this.emailInput.setAttribute('aria-invalid', 'true');
            this.emailInput.classList.add('invalid');
            this.showError(this.emailInput, 'Invalid email format');
        } else {
            this.emailInput.setAttribute('aria-invalid', 'false');
            this.emailInput.classList.remove('invalid');
            this.clearError(this.emailInput);
        }
    }

    private validatePasswordField() {
        const password = this.passwordInput.value;
        const isValid = !password || this.validatePassword(password);

        if (!isValid) {
            this.passwordInput.setAttribute('aria-invalid', 'true');
            this.passwordInput.classList.add('invalid');
            this.showError(
                this.passwordInput,
                'Password must be 8+ chars with uppercase, lowercase, and numbers'
            );
        } else {
            this.passwordInput.setAttribute('aria-invalid', 'false');
            this.passwordInput.classList.remove('invalid');
            this.clearError(this.passwordInput);
        }
    }

    private showError(input: HTMLInputElement, message: string) {
        const errorId = `${input.id}-error`;
        let errorElement = document.getElementById(errorId);

        if (!errorElement) {
            errorElement = document.createElement('div');
            errorElement.id = errorId;
            errorElement.role = 'alert';
            errorElement.setAttribute('aria-live', 'polite');
            errorElement.className = 'error-message';
            input.parentElement?.appendChild(errorElement);
        }

        errorElement.textContent = message;
        input.setAttribute('aria-describedby', errorId);
    }

    private clearError(input: HTMLInputElement) {
        const errorId = `${input.id}-error`;
        const errorElement = document.getElementById(errorId);
        if (errorElement) {
            errorElement.remove();
        }
        input.removeAttribute('aria-describedby');
    }
}

CSS Styling:

/* Validation states */
input[aria-invalid="true"] {
    border-color: #dc2626;
    background-color: #fee2e2;
}

input[aria-invalid="false"] {
    border-color: #10b981;
    background-color: #ecfdf5;
}

.error-message {
    color: #dc2626;
    font-size: 0.875rem;
    margin-top: 4px;
    display: block;
}

.invalid {
    border-color: #dc2626 !important;
}
RIV-XXX MEDIUM

Implement Client-Side Form Validation

Acceptance Criteria (BDD):
  • Given a user enters invalid email
    When they blur the field
    Then the field should have aria-invalid="true" and show error message
  • Given a user enters invalid password
    When they type in the field
    Then real-time feedback should indicate missing requirements
  • Given valid input
    When validation passes
    Then aria-invalid should be "false" and visual feedback should indicate success
  • Given screen reader user
    When error occurs
    Then aria-live="polite" should announce the error message
Action Plan

Implementation Roadmap

🔴 Critical (Immediate - This Sprint)

RIV-XXX: Enable HTTPS/TLS

Effort: 4-8 hours (Infrastructure)
Impact: Protects credentials
Status: Blocking

RIV-XXX: Security Headers

Effort: 2-4 hours (Backend)
Impact: Prevents common attacks
Status: Blocking

🟠 High Priority (Next Sprint)

RIV-XXX: Mobile Responsiveness

Effort: 1-2 hours (Frontend)
Impact: WCAG compliance, UX
Status: Active

RIV-XXX: Client Validation

Effort: 2-4 hours (Frontend)
Impact: UX, accessibility
Status: Active

🟡 Medium Priority (Backlog)

RIV-XXX: Add Alt Text

Effort: 5 minutes (Trivial)
Impact: Quick win
Status: Ready

RIV-XXX: ARIA Enhancement

Effort: 1-2 hours (Frontend)
Impact: Accessibility
Status: Ready

📋 All Jira work items created with BDD acceptance criteria and implementation code. Start with critical security fixes, then move to accessibility and UX improvements.
Next Steps

Ready to Improve

✅ Comprehensive Testing

40 automated tests executed with detailed findings and recommendations

📋 Jira Ready

All issues documented with BDD acceptance criteria and implementation code

🚀 Actionable

Clear priorities, effort estimates, and concrete code examples for each fix

Test Date: December 14, 2025
Framework: Playwright v1.57.0
Overall Grade: C+ (Functional • Needs Security Hardening)

This report was generated by the Playwright E2E Test Automation Agent
with comprehensive evaluation of security, accessibility, and responsive design.